By Adam

🦊
Awaytime
Open Source

Opal vs Jomo app blocker for strict phone limits

October 9, 2026·7 min read

Opal is the stronger pick if you need a block you cannot switch off and use iPhone, Android, or Mac. Jomo is the better fit for Apple-only users who want blocks triggered by a time, a screen-time limit, or a required action, with a lower published annual price.

TL;DR For an Opal vs Jomo app blocker decision, choose Opal for cross-platform blocking and its documented "Hard Mode," while choose Jomo for Apple-device blocking with action-based access, budgets, and a lower-priced Plus plan. Awaytime is an iOS-only alternative for people who want visual daily-limit feedback alongside app blocking.

  • Per Opal's pricing page, the free plan allows one Rule, while Opal Pro costs $99.99 billed annually.
  • Per Jomo's pricing page, Jomo Plus costs $29.99 per year and includes up to 10 sessions and up to 10 actions or limits.
  • Per Opal's pricing page, Hard Mode has "No way out. You can't turn Opal off."
  • Per Jomo's site, Jomo can block apps at set times, after a limit, or until you take an action.
  • Awaytime is an iOS app blocker whose App Store listing says its free base app includes blocking, with paid upgrades for additional features.

Opal vs Jomo app blocker comparison

Both apps block distracting apps. Their published setup models differ enough that the choice usually comes down to device coverage and the kind of rule you want to create.

| Comparison point | Opal | Jomo | |---|---|---| | Platforms | Per Opal's pricing page, Opal supports iOS, Android, and Mac. | Per Jomo's site, Jomo supports iPhone, iPad, and Mac. | | Free plan | Per Opal's pricing page, free includes app blocking, basic timers and soundscapes, today's Opal Score, and one Rule. | Per Jomo's pricing page, free includes one session, one action or limit, one screen-time budget, squads, and reports. | | Paid annual plan | Per Opal's pricing page, Opal Pro is $99.99 billed annually. | Per Jomo's pricing page, Jomo Plus Annual is $29.99 per year. | | Strict blocking | Per Opal's pricing page, Hard Mode means "No way out. You can't turn Opal off." | Per Jomo's pricing page, strict mode is included with Jomo Plus. | | Rule types | Opal lists Rules, Timers, Allow Only, and app blocking on its pricing page. | Jomo says blocks can run at set times, after a limit, or until you take action on its product page. |

Should you choose Opal or Jomo for blocking?

Choose Opal when your block has to apply beyond Apple devices. Its published platform list includes Android, which makes it the clear option if your distracting app use moves between an Android phone, iPhone, and Mac.

Opal is also the clearer choice when you specifically want its Hard Mode promise. Its public pricing page describes the setting in unusually direct terms: "No way out. You can't turn Opal off." Set up a Rule for the exact apps that pull you in, then test it on each device you use before depending on it during an exam week or at bedtime.

Choose Jomo when you use Apple devices and want the trigger itself to carry more of the plan. Jomo's published options cover three distinct situations:

  • Block social media from 9 p.m. until morning.
  • Block an app after you use up its daily limit.
  • Keep an app blocked until you complete Jomo's chosen action.

That action-based option matters if a timer alone feels easy to dismiss. Jomo Plus also documents up to 10 sessions and 10 actions or limits. If you need separate arrangements for work, sleep, school, and weekends, count those configurations before choosing a plan.

How do the free plans change the decision?

The free tiers are practical ways to test the part of each app that matters most to you.

Opal's free plan gives you one Rule. Use it for the single app or app group most likely to break a focus session. If it holds across your actual devices, then the Pro price is easier to judge against the need for more Rules, historical Opal Score, and other Pro features.

Jomo's free plan gives you one session, one action or limit, and one screen-time budget. Use the action or limit on the app you repeatedly open by reflex. That test shows whether Jomo's "until you take action" approach changes the moment you would otherwise tap straight through.

Jomo Plus is listed at $29.99 annually, while Opal Pro is listed at $99.99 annually on their respective pricing pages. The gap is meaningful when both apps cover your device setup. Opal's Android support and Hard Mode are the documented reasons to pay more. Jomo's Apple-only setup, budgets, reports, squads, and action-based blocks are the documented reasons to choose its lower-priced plan.

What does strict mode mean in each app?

Opal publicly explains the enforcement claim for Hard Mode. The setting is intended to prevent you from turning Opal off.

Jomo publicly lists strict mode as a Plus feature, alongside sessions, actions or limits, Apple Health integration, and multiple budgets. Its pricing page does not describe strict mode with the same "No way out" wording. Check Jomo's current support material and the setting screen if strict-mode behavior is the deciding factor for you.

Every iPhone app blocker also works within Apple's operating-system controls. Awaytime's App Store listing says it uses Apple's Screen Time and Family Controls framework. Apple settings can affect those controls, so treat any blocker as a tool you configure and test, rather than a permanent barrier outside your phone's settings.

Is Awaytime a useful Opal or Jomo alternative?

Awaytime is iOS-only and does not publish a strict-mode equivalent to Opal Hard Mode. It fits a different preference: seeing a daily-limit consequence on the dashboard while you use your phone.

According to Awaytime's App Store listing, Awaytime is a free iOS screen-time control app with in-app purchases and app or website blocking. Current in-app behavior uses a fox avatar whose mood reflects how much of your daily limit you have used. The app also lets you choose apps, categories, and web domains to block through Apple's selection interface.

That feedback can suit someone who has dismissed plain timers without thinking. For the detailed setup options, see Awaytime's focus blocks and app limits and reminders. If your priority is an unremovable block across Android and Mac, Opal remains the closer match. If you need action-based Apple-device rules, Jomo remains the closer match.

Which app should you pick?

Pick Opal if all three points apply:

  • You use Android as well as iPhone or Mac.
  • You want the published Hard Mode promise.
  • One free Rule is enough to test before you consider Pro.

Pick Jomo if you use Apple devices and want blocks based on time, a usage limit, or an action. Its published $29.99 annual Plus price, 10-session cap, and 10-action-or-limit cap make the plan easier to size before paying.

Pick Awaytime if you want iOS blocking with a visible daily-limit cue on the dashboard instead of a strict-mode replacement. Its analytics page can also show your screen-time report across different time views.

Set your first focus block in Awaytime.

FAQ

Is Opal better than Jomo?

Opal is the better documented choice for Android support and for a block described by Opal as impossible to turn off in Hard Mode. Jomo is the lower-priced Apple-only choice with blocks based on time, limits, or actions.

Does Jomo have a free plan?

Yes. Per Jomo's pricing page, the free plan includes one session, one action or limit, one screen-time budget, squads, and reports.

Does Opal work on Android?

Yes. Per Opal's pricing page, Opal supports iOS, Android, and Mac.

Is Awaytime available on Android?

Awaytime should be treated as iOS-only. Its App Store listing requires iOS 16.6 or later, and Android availability has not been confirmed.

Take Back Your Screen Time

Awaytime helps you set friction on the apps that pull you in.

Download Awaytime